I read the opinion on the New York Time. It talked about the politic of Libya. I agree with the author that “unless some way is found to stop him, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi of Libya will slaughter hundreds or even thousands of his own people in his desperation to hang on to power.” We recognized a big popular revulsion against an autocratic regime, and lauded some countries’ movement for their civilized and restrained demeanor. Why don’t let people of each nation decide for itself? Although there is much more open talk of direct military, technological, and economic intervention in Libya, there is not an obvious consensus, which they need to overthrow the regime. It’s necessary for Libya. Therefore, “some member may also be turning against the regime”. Obama spoke with France, Britain, and Italy to find ways to stop the killing. The authors are right the best way is economy. American and Europe can block Libya’s access to the international financial system. Next, they ban Europe to sell weapons to Libya. Finally, the US and Europe will deny the visa travel of Libyan leaders.
In my brief, I agree the authors of methods are necessary to stop killing in Libya. If the killing still continue, what should the US and Europe solve? I think Libyan leader should connect with the military to find the best for regime. Let people of Libyan decide for its.
